We Came to an Agreement on

As a professional, I must point out that the phrase „we came to an agreement on“ is a common mistake that can harm your search engine optimization efforts. In this article, we will explain the issue and suggest alternative phrasings to help improve your content`s overall visibility.

The problem with „we came to an agreement on“ is two-fold. Firstly, it is an unnecessarily long and wordy phrase that can be simplified and streamlined. Secondly, it can be seen as a passive construction that does not provide much information about the specifics of the agreement or the parties involved.

To improve your content`s SEO and readability, consider using more direct and concise language. For example, instead of saying „we came to an agreement on the project timeline,“ simply state „we agreed on the project timeline.“ This phrasing is more straightforward and active, providing a clearer picture of the agreement and who was involved.

Additionally, it may be helpful to include more context or details about the agreement to enhance your content`s relevance and value to readers. Instead of just stating that an agreement was reached, explain what specifically was agreed upon and why it matters. This can help your content stand out and provide more value to your audience.

In conclusion, the phrase „we came to an agreement on“ is a commonly used but potentially harmful construction in terms of SEO. To improve your content`s visibility and value, we recommend simplifying and streamlining your language, using more direct and active constructions, and providing more context and details about the agreement. By taking these steps, you can improve both the readability and relevance of your content, ultimately helping it rank higher in search engine results.